This research was conducted to answer the problems posed in this thesis that is how the

judge consideration in dropping the verdict in the case No. 7/Pid.Sus.Anak/2017/Pn.Wno. To

answer the problem, normative legal research is conducted based on secondary data and

primary data as supporting. After collected the data is processed with qualitative analysis

that is the connecting connection then compare and describe the data and seek truth based

on the legal provisions in the Child Criminal Justice System that is the child is sentenced ½

(half) of the adult punishment and the Criminal Code which impose the penalty with

absorption sharpened. Therefore, it can be concluded that the low decision on the Child

BAYU SAPUTRA Bin SUTRISNO because judges are more considering non juridical factor

is that parents of children who have divorced and the Son was forced to drop out due to

economic conditions that are classified as less able. It is recommended for prosecutors in

prosecution there is a mistake that the written article of experiment is then included in the

article of the story. For the judge to be careful when there is a mistake from the prosecutor's

demands so that people do not suspect that before the prosecutor and judge have played the

law.