The development of crime (criminal act) which is more global and increased
caused the prejudice of society toward the government and legal upholders apparatus
in conducting legal supremacy in Indonesia. One of the criminal acts which is more
global and complex is corruption criminal act, where currently this matter has been a
collective case for international world, by the reason of the result of corruption of a
corruption in Indonesia in generally is kept abroad in order it is difficult to be
recognized by another person (legal upholder apparatus). This research conducted by
the author by the hope in order could be advantageous for all level, in particularly for
the author which would like to analyze and know on the efforts of legal enforcement
which is established by the Indonesia government since Indonesia ratified UNCAC
and what are the factors which for so long become the barriers in the enforcement of
UNCAC in Indonesia. This research was conducted by normative legal research, i.e.
by studying valid norms or writings (books) which have relevancies with the case
understudied where the author also conducted field research in Corruption
Eradication Commission (KPK) by interviewing to one of the source persons. After
the author conducted research and analysis, thus the author could conclusion that the
efforts of legal enforcement toward the restitution of state-owned assets after
Indonesia ratified UNCAC become more actual and has big opportunities to conduct
any efforts in preventing the seizure (confiscation) and management of assets
although there are some matters which become the case in the implementation, both
from legal point of view and the consideration of its people (legal community).