The title of this legal research is “ Use of Wiretap Evidence in
Criminal Justice Corruption “ aims to find out whether wiretap with the
approval of the judge an examiner prefatory also valid in eradicating
corruption conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission having the
draft Criminal Procedure Code be issued. The method used in this study is a
normative legal research. Normative legal research is a study that focuses on
the norms of positive law and is done by studying the legislation and
regulations relating to the problems studied. Source of data used is
secondary data obtained through literature, namely primary raw materials
and secondary raw materials. Based on the results of the study, that the
tapping with the approval of the judge an examiner prefatory does not apply
to Corruption Eradication Commission. In accordance with the principle of
lex specialis derogat legi generalis and regulations that completely
specialized precedence than rules that in general. The Act of Corruption
Eradication Commission completely specialized (lex specialis) while the
Criminal Procedure Code in general (lex generalis). In the Act arranged that
Corruption Eradication Commission authority to carry tapping in carrying
out tasks investigation and the prosecution which means tapping can be
conducted Corruption Eradication Commission without must obtain
permission judge an examiner prelude. If tapping by Corruption Eradication
Commission must obtain permission then need revision against the act.