The title of this legal research is “ Use of Wiretap Evidence in Criminal
Justice Corruption “ aims to find out whether wiretap with the approval of the
judge an examiner prefatory also valid in eradicating corruption conducted by the
Corruption Eradication Commission having the draft Criminal Procedure Code be
issued. The method used in this study is a normative legal research. Normative
legal research is a study that focuses on the norms of positive law and is done by
studying the legislation and regulations relating to the problems studied. Source of
data used is secondary data obtained through literature, namely primary raw
materials and secondary raw materials. Based on the results of the study, that the
tapping with the approval of the judge an examiner prefatory does not apply to
Corruption Eradication Commission. In accordance with the principle of lex
specialis derogat legi generalis and regulations that completely specialized
precedence than rules that in general. The Act of Corruption Eradication
Commission completely specialized (lex specialis) while the Criminal Procedure
Code in general (lex generalis). In the Act arranged that Corruption Eradication
Commission authority to carry tapping in carrying out tasks investigation and the
prosecution which means tapping can be conducted Corruption Eradication
Commission without must obtain permission judge an examiner prelude. If
tapping by Corruption Eradication Commission must obtain permission then need
revision against the act.