This thesis titled, Studies about revocation of Defedant Description In Trial and
Implication Juridical Evidence Againts Power Tools, where the defendant repeal
explanations in the investigation caused of intimidation and its own act intended not
confine will it. Method research used namely normative. The result analysis over the
answer to the problem by way of first that revocation information, the defendant was
allowed for KUHAP own set it implicitly namely the rights a dissenter. This provision
is stipulated in article 189 KUHAP in conjunction to article 52 KUHAP. Both by
implication, if the revocation was received means the defendant free pure (vrijspraak) of
all lawsuits charged him where that was found in a newsworthy event investigation is
not perceived as right and the information cannot be used as the basis for helping to find
evidence at the trial, if the revocation was rejected means the reason unfounded and not
true. It becomes a clue over the mistakes the defendant because it gives information is
convoluted in the investigation so that information the defendant in front of
investigators that contains an element of truth and it has value the strength of evidence.
In the analysis the award is the revocation was rejected because unfounded and illogical
as stipulated in a verdict by the supreme court on 23 February 1960, no. 299 K / Kr /
1959, that reads “The Revocation of The Description of a Defendant in a Trial without
Reason to Lawful and Right is a clue over the mistakes of the defendant.”