This thesis titled, Studies about revocation of Defedant Description In Trial and
Implication Juridical Evidence Againts Power Tools, where the defendant repeal explanations
in the investigation caused of intimidation and its own act intended not confine will it.
Method research used namely normative. The result analysis over the answer to the problem
by way of first that revocation information, the defendant was allowed for KUHAP own set it
implicitly namely the rights a dissenter. This provision is stipulated in article 189 KUHAP in
conjunction to article 52 KUHAP. Both by implication, if the revocation was received means
the defendant free pure (vrijspraak) of all lawsuits charged him where that was found in a
newsworthy event investigation is not perceived as right and the information cannot be used
as the basis for helping to find evidence at the trial, if the revocation was rejected means the
reason unfounded and not true. It becomes a clue over the mistakes the defendant because it
gives information is convoluted in the investigation so that information the defendant in front
of investigators that contains an element of truth and it has value the strength of evidence. In
the analysis the award is the revocation was rejected because unfounded and illogical as
stipulated in a verdict by the supreme court on 23 February 1960, no. 299 K / Kr / 1959, that
reads “The Revocation of The Description of a Defendant in a Trial without Reason to
Lawful and Right is a clue over the mistakes of the defendant.”