This essay titled The Acquistion Implementation In Indonesian Broadcasting Competition. This
essay problem formulation how an unsynchronized resolutioan between Article 18 Verse (1) Jo
Article 34 Verse (4) of Regulation Number 32 of 2002 on broadcasting and Regulation Number 5
of 1999 on Monopoly Practice Ban and Unfair Business Competition was. This research was aimed
to know how an unsynchronized resolution between Article 18 Verse (1) Jo Article (34) of
Regulation Number 32 of 2002 on broadcasting and Regulation Number 5 of 1999 on Monopoly
Practice Ban and Unfair Business Competition. The research that would be conducted was a
normative research. The normative law research focused on positive law norms i.e. legislatioan on
Monopoly Practice Ban and Unfair Business Competition and Broadcasting Regulation. The
conclusioan of this essay was an unsynchronized resolution between Regulation Number 5 of 1999
on Monopoly Practice Ban and Unfair Business Competition Regulation and Article 18 Verse (1) Jo
Article (4) of Regulation Number 32 of 2002 on broadcasting was, by using lex specialis derogate
legi generali principle. Article 18 Verse (1) Jo Article (4) of Regulation Number 32 of 2002 on
broadcasting that was a specific law to regulate monopoly in broadcasting business and was made
evasive from general law namely Regulation Number 5 of 1999 on Monopoly Practice Ban and
Unfair Business Competition where this regulation regulated provision on monopoly practice ban
and unfair business competition in overall business fields.