Price fixing agreement is one of the probihited agreement in statue No
5/1999 about antitrust law and unfair competition. ASATIN, is one of ticketing
organization in Lombok, Mataram, in which the members were verdicted by the
assembly of the business competition supervisory commission, because they made
an agreement about the amount of fee given the sub agent who sold the airlines
tickets from the Agents, namely the ASATIN Members. In the verdict, the
agreement is against clause 5 paragraph (1) of statue No. 5/1999 about antitrust
law and unfair competition. From the above background, it is in the writing of this
essay presented three main issues, namely : what is the legal consideration given
by the assembly of the business competition supervisory commission in verdict No.
10/KPPU-L/2009, which has annul the price fixing agreement that created by the
members of ASATIN ? Can the amount of fee agreement be qualified as price
fixing agreement which regulated in clause 5 paragraph (1) of statue No. 5/1999
about antitrust law and unfair competition ? and what are the legal consequences
of the annulated price fixing agreement that created by the members of ASATIN?.
This research is normative research, made by reviewing/analyzing secondary data
in the form of legal materials, especially primary legal materials and secondary
legal materials to understand the law as a set of rules or norms in the system of
positive law governing the human life. The conclusion of the research indicate
that the amount of fee agreement cannpt be qualified as a price fixing agreement
because there is a different interpretation within some factors such as price and
the legal subject between the agent and the sub agent which is the agency
partnership.