This research entitled The Execution of Judge’s Verdicts by Attorney in
Corruption Criminal Proceed. It aimed to: 1) Find out data on process of Judge’s
verdicts execution in corruption criminal proceed; 2) Find out data on Attorney’s
obstacles in applying Judge’s verdicts execution on corruption criminal proceed.
The research made use of legal research, to find data on Attorney’s execution and
obstacles on applying Judge’s verdicts in corruption criminal proceed. The
primary data supported by secondary data obtained from books, legal opinions,
interview with informants, and from websites. Based on those data, the results are
Judge’s verdicts executions by Attorney in corruption criminal proceeds,
especially at Sleman are easier, because convicts are more cooperative on
imprisonment execution. Whereas, there are more problem in criminal fine and
money return executions, because convicts prefer serving on detention to paying
money they had abused. In my opinion, Attorneys have to coordinate with Police
department and other related side to detent corruption criminal immediately so
that suspects cannot run away to foreign country while on police investigation and
inquiry process, encoding for process and confiscation corruptors properties, so
they cannot move it to third party or brought to other country. I also thought that
this could develop the criminal detention, whether convicts choose not to pay fine
and return corrupted money.