After the enactment of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the second amendment to Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, a discussion developed that questioned the independence of the Corruption
Eradication Commission and its existence as a state institution within the executive power group, this thesis examines the Corrruption Eradication Committee as an
independent institution, its existence and its relationships to the Indonesian constitutional system. This research uses a normative juridical approach, namely examining legal provisions and decisions related to the Corruption Eradication Commission as an independent and its existence in the constitutional system. A hermeneutic approach examines the meaning, context, and experiences related to
related terms and formulations. This research confirms that the independence of the Corruption Eradication Committee after the formation of Law No. 19 of 2019 was understood as the absence of dependence on freedom in determining policies. The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) is a state institution within the executive power group because it carries out administrative duties : coordinating,
supervising, monitoring, conducting investigations, investigating, and prosecuting. The KPK as an executive institution means that it is a government institution that
implements government power. This research limits its study to aspects of independence and its existence in the Indonesian constitutional system after the enactment of Law No. 19 of 2019.