This study aims to determine: (1) the implementation of Perda DIY No. 3/2013
concerning Management of Household Waste and Household-like Waste and (2) knowing
the form of legal protection for communities who are victims of environmental pollution as
a result of waste management at the Piyungan TPST, Bantul Regency. This research is
included in the study of empirical law. Data collection was carried out by interviews and
literature study. Data analysis used qualitative analysis with deductive reasoning methods.
The research results show that: (1) the implementation of Perda DIY No. 3/2013 in terms of
formulation has been good but not much is in line with practice in the field, especially in the
Piyungan TPST. This happened because there was a deliberation that allowed local residents
to scavenge and herd livestock, garbage trucks often leaked in the manual transport bins,
there was no compensation for residents, and there was no technology that could break down
waste quickly with an efficient method. (2) The form of legal protection for victims of
environmental pollution as a result of waste management at the Piyungan TPST, Bantul
Regency, is to provide compensation in accordance with Article 35 of Perda DIY No. 3/2013
in the form of relocation, environmental restoration costs, health and medical expenses, and
other compensation equivalent to the negative impacts arising from household waste
management activities and waste similar to household waste.