Law research titled The Review of Implementation of Military
Prosecuting Attorney Function in the Process of Jurisdiction Interconnection
Case Handling in Military Court Area was conducted to anwer the existing law
problems of what the function of Military Prosecuting Attorney in the process of
jurisdiction case handling at military court area was and what the threat face by
Military Prosecuting Attorney in handling the jurisdiction interconnection case
was. The purpose of this research was to determine the function of Military
Prosecuting Attorney in the process of jurisdiction case handling at military
court area and to determine the threat face by Military Prosecuting Attorney in
handling the jurisdiction interconnection case. The type of law research used was
normative law research. The source of data was secondary data of primary,
secondary, and tersiary law material. Data collection method conducted by
reference study and interview. After obtaining data, they were analyzed
qualitatively and conclusion was mad deductively.
The result of research showed that it formed fixed team functioning to
determine which parties was most disadvantageous. The number of loss was used
to determine the court that had authority to examine jurisdiction interconnection
case. Investigation of jurisdiction interconnection case was conducted by fixed
team including Military Prosecuting Attorney, Police, and Military Police. The
threat faced was that the fixed team had not formed in each local area and there
was a command line in TNI organization and less coordinatin among law
enforcement apparatus. The suggestion given was the formation of fixed team in
the local area that had potential in the dualism of law jurisdiction, the increase of
coordination between Military Prosecuting Attorney, Attorney, and Police, and
the increase of control from community on the military court in order to create
the balance, transparency, accountability, and law enforcement.