Article 19 of the Basic Agrarian Law regulates the implementation of land registration to
provide legal certainty and legal protection. Land registration can be carried out if the sale
and purchase of land is carried out before the PPAT in accordance with Article 37 Paragraph
(1) PP 24 of 1997 where a Deed made by the PPAT will be produced. But in reality it is
associated with the District Court Decision No. 28/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Clp sale and purchase
between Mr. Sahlan Subarjo and Mrs. Apriliani Mahramah's interest is not carried out before
the PPAT and is only proven by a receipt for receiving money. The problem raised is whether
the sale and purchase between Ny. Apriliani Mahramah's interest with Mr. Sahlan Subarjo in
accordance with the conception of buying and selling land? And what about legal protection
for Mrs. Apriliani Mahramah interest as the right holder? The type of research used in this
research is normative legal research, with the nature of descriptive research. The data used is
secondary data, and using normative analysis methods. How to draw conclusions in this study
using the deductive method. The first conclusion from this study is that the buying and selling
carried out by Mrs. Interest and Mr. Sahlan are legal when viewed from the material terms of
sale and purchase, and are legal according to cash requirements in the concept of Customary
Law but are not valid when viewed from the formal conditions of sale and purchase because
these conditions are not fulfilled. The second conclusion, Mrs. Interest as a right holder obtains
legal protection based on a judge's decision in the District Court Decision No.
28/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Clp because Mrs. Interest is in good faith to register the land in order to
obtain legal protection for the land purchased from the sale and purchase transaction