In this writing, specifically about how the legal status of the separatist
creditors in bankruptcy creditors when compared with holders of rights
guaranteed in the event of confiscation guarantees? And how the settlement
process? The research objective was to determine the the legal status of the
separatist creditor in the bankruptcy creditors compared with holders of rights
guarantees in the event of confiscation guarantees and completion process.types of
legal research which is kind of normative research. The results of this study is
that, when viewed from the bankruptcy settlement of the separatist creditor
creditors that the holder of the security right is bankruptcy law under Article 55
has provided an exception to the separatist creditor where the separatist creditor
where the creditor is able to directly solve security object as if nothing happened
bankruptcy. But in fact, this law is inconsistent because next to in Article 56
paragraph (1) says that the process of execution to the creditor holding security
rights can only be done 90 days after the bankruptcy verdict pronounced. Thus the
principle of execution in bankruptcy, nowthstanding the provisions of this
warranty which entitles the creditor toguarantee the rights holders directly to
execute after the defaults based on the decision of the District Court. The advice
from the author for commercial courts in Indonesia not only in big cities only, but
should also be in all areas in Indonesia, the high Court that is known by the
public. And for the judges, so do not always accept the defaults litigation, but also
see elements of bankruptcy