This legal writing is entitled “The Role of Commission of Judiciary
towords the attonery’s Performance as General Prosecutor in Corruption Criminal
Action”. The problem formulation was: what is the barrier to the commission of
attorney in supervising the attorney’s performance as general prosecutor in
corruption criminal action? The purpose of this research was to comprenhend and
finding out any data concerning on the barriers of Commission of Judiciary in
supervising the attorney’s review were: 1) The meaning of the role of commission
of judiciary, 2) Supervising and monitoring the general prosecutor’s performance.
The type of this research was normative reseach. The data of this reseach gained
from primary and secondary legal sources. The method of data collection was
conducted by literary reseach and direct interview to the source person. The data
analysis was qualitatively conducted through 4 step, i.e.: description of positive
law, systematization of positive law, interpretation of positive law, and analysis of
secondary legal source. The location of this researrch was in the office of
Commission of Judiciary located on Jalan Rambai no. 1 A Kebayoran, South
Jakarta. The source person was Puspo Aji as the Vice of Commission of Judiciary.
Indonesia state is a legal state, thus the legal enforcement and justice are absolute
conditions. However in fact, the legal apparatus conduct legal violation. One of
them is the attorney as the legal enforcement who has authority to conduct
prosecution; the attorneys misue their authority due of their private necessities and
neglect the general necessities. Thus the president founded a commission named
Commission of Judiciary who has duty to supervise the attorney’s performance
inside or outside the departement. However the commission of judiciary has not
been optimal caused at least the report of internal supervision, the happenings of
collusion in internal supervision.