Crime is a thing that often happens in society. The existence of a crime requires
criminal responsibility. Indonesia as a law state still has a justice system whose
accountability tends to lead to the imposition of sanctions on perpetrators of crimes
which is called retributive justice. Along with developments in society, a case
settlement method is needed by bringing together victims and perpetrators so that
mediation is carried out in finding solutions and ending in the termination of
prosecution of the perpetrators. In criminal law the settlement of these cases is
known as restorative justice where the goal to be achieved is the restoration of the
victim to its original state and justice for the perpetrator.Settlement of cases with a
restorative justice approach focuses on the level of the prosecutor's office as a part
of the justice system that has authority in prosecution. Regulation also allows the
prosecutor's office to terminate prosecutions based on restorative justice by issuing
Prosecutor's Regulation number 15 of 2020 concerning termination of prosecutions
based on restorative justice. The case study used in this paper is a case study with
case number Print -2553/M.2.10/Eoh.2/07/2022. The author examines how
restorative justice is implemented, the suitability of the terms and procedures for
stopping prosecution by the prosecutor so that the act of stopping prosecution can
answer community problems, especially for justice seekers.