Corruption means the activity of every human either government or private of which
violates the laws to conduct self-enriching activity or behalf to other person or
corporative of which brings disadvantages to state financial. The implementation of
reverse verification is limited in the resolution process of corruption criminal action
case. The implementation of reverse verification in the resolution process of
corruption criminal action case is a deviation in the criminal law of which is regulated
in Criminal Code. Based aforementioned above background problem, thus the case
emerging is the implementation of reserve verification in the resolution process of
corruption criminal action case and the factors of which can influence the
implementation of limited reverse verification in resolution process of corruption
criminal action case. This research was normative legal research, i.e. a legal research
of which is focused on the norm, and this research needs secondary data as primary
data source of which gained from literary study such as relating regulations and
literatures. The data gained was then analyzed descriptively-qualitatively, and then
compiled systematically and presented in the shape of analysis. From this analysis it
can be concluded in principally the implementation of limited reverse verification is
almost similar to the usual ordinary. However, in limited reverse verification the
defendant is given right to prove that the defendant did not conduct corruption
criminal action as accused by the public prosecutor. The determination on the
existence of right to prove that the defendant did not conduct corruption criminal
action is firmly stated in the Article 37 Paragraph (1) of the Laws Number 31 of 1999
junction Article 37 Paragraph (1) the Laws Number 20 of 2001. It is different to usual
verification in Criminal Code is not firmly stated that the defendant has right to
prove, although in practice, the defendant is given by the judge opportunity to prove
that he is guilty. In the implementation of limited reverse verification there are many
factors of which influence the regulations of which mandate the implementation of
limited reverse verification, the factor of professional legal apparatus either the judge
or the prosecutor and the factor of the defendant himself, on the ground of limited
reverse verification is a right given by the laws to the defendant, thus the defendant
can use it. All of these are the considerations of the judge in providing any ver