This study is titled Supervision of the State Administrative Court against the
State Administrative decisions at the Yogyakarta State Administrative Court (Case
Study of the Decision of the Yogyakarta State Administrative Court Number:
4/G/2019/PTUN.YK.). This study aims to find out how are the Yogyakarta State
Administrative Court carries out its supervisory function in the dispute Number
4/G/2019/PTUN.YK. What are the obstacles faced by the Yogyakarta
Administrative Court in carrying out these functions in the a quo dispute; and what
efforts have been made by the Yogyakarta State Administrative Court to overcome
these obstacles.
In this study, the writer uses normative legal research: researching and
analyzing the secondary data. The secondary data is compiled systematically,
studied objectively, and then conclusions are drawn in relation to the problem of
study.
The results of the study shows that first, the Yogyakarta Administrative
Court has carried out its supervisory function in the a quo dispute. This supervision
is a juridical control over state administration disputes, and this control is repressive
and rechmatigheid. Second, the Yogyakarta Administrative Court cannot confirm
whether the disputing parties have implemented the decision or not, because the
parties did not file a legal action against the decision. The Plaintiff did not submit
an application letter to the Chairperson of the Yogyakarta Administrative Court
regarding the Defendant's non-implementation of the decision, because the parties
did not file a legal action against the decision. The Plaintiff also did not submit a
letter of application to the Chairperson of the Yogyakarta Administrative Court
regarding the Defendant is not implementing the decision, and there is a possibility
that the Plaintiff accepted the decision voluntarily, even though the Defendant did
not implement the verdict. Third, the Yogyakarta Administrative Court is a judicial
institution established to oversee the administration of government through juridical
control over state administrative decisions. Thus, it is necessary to make continuous
improvements to overcome obstacles to the implementation of supervision by the
administrative court including the Yogyakarta Administrative Court against state
administrative decisions issued by state administrative officials