The title of this research is a Review of The Judge’s Decision Number 1397/Pid.Sus/2020/
PN Sby About Procurement of Medical Equipments That Do Not Have License. There are
private legal entities who made hand sanitizer independently, as done by the owner of CV
Medistra Sarana Sukses which is proven that they sold hand sanitizer before the license from
BPOM for the hand sanitizer is issued. The purpose of this study is to know and analyze the
consideration of the judge's verdict and the conformity between the Law on Health and the
judge's ruling contained in the Criminal Verdict Number 1397/Pid.Sus/2020/ PN Sby About
Procurement of Medical Equipments That Do Not Have License. This research uses a
normative writing method that focuses on positive legal norms in the form of laws and
regulations regarding health and consumer protection, and also judge rulings contained in the
Criminal Verdict Number 1397/Pid.Sus/2020/ PN Sby About Procurement of Medical
Equipments That Do Not Have License. The conclusion of this research is that the judge in
deciding each case does not always stick to the prosecutor's claim because the judge has the
right to freely choose which charges are proven, because with high threats even the judge can
give a light verdict even pure freedom and the judge in this case has reflected the principles
of certainty, expediency and justice.