Every judicial environment in Indonesia basically has its own authority. Between the one judicial
environment and the other judicial environment cannot be combined in the settlement of the
case. However, unlike the case of connectivity, the provisions regarding connectivity cases open
up the possibility of combining cases caused by criminal acts carried out by civilians and the
military together. In accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law
Number 31 of 1997 concerning military justice, related to cases of connectivity, both civilian
actors belonging to the General Judiciary as well as military circles belonging to the Military
Courts must be examined and tried jointly (case merged) in court in the General Court unless
according to the Decree of the Minister of Defense with the approval of the Supreme Court the
case must be examined by a court in the Military Court environment. The purpose of this study
was to find out the implementation of the court of connectivity in the Military Justice
environment and the obstacles in the court proceedings in the context of connectivity. In
discussing the issues raised, the author uses normative legal research methods and is qualitative
in nature. The results of the study found obstacles in resolving connectivity cases, including
complicated and lengthy procedures because the connectivity team had to be made based on joint
decisions from the Supreme Court, Attorney General, Oditur General and Minister of Defense.
The author's advice is that there is a need for regulations governing cases of connectivity,
especially regarding changes in the mechanism of justice, which is shorter and easier