Construction consists of any phase activities in project. Certainly in every
phase of work change occur as an issue that decorate in stage of work. In change
management, change order is one of the variation in project. This paper presents
an exploratory case study to identify main point of change order case in
Yogyakarta. Basic statement used for supporting method in order to answer the
objectives. By identifying change order case, parties involved as planner and
executor are able to analyze their performance that influence relationship between
all parties.
The purpose of this study is to identify what are change order parameter
on building projects in Yogyakarta, what are the response type of contractor in the
face of change order. The data that used in this study are collected by distributing
questionnaire to the contractors directly in Yogyakarta. Equally in every project,
The respondents are project manager, site manager, and site engineer. Ranking
change order is used to identifiy the main causes , effects, benefits, and remedies
of change orders, and response type by contractor perception in the facing of
change orders. Descriptive statistics using excel to identify the accumulate
number from questionnaire.
The result of data analysis showed that respondents strongly agree with
statement in questionnaire that the main cause is owner instructs modification to
design, the effects is cost overruns, benefits is prevent disputes between contractor
and owner, and remedies about the procedures for handling change order are clear
from beginning. Indicate to response type, avoidance and reduction get the high
response from cause and effect. The result also implies that with basic statement
can answer simple issue in project. Finally change orders have positively related
to the contractor performance, not too much contribution on increasing contractor
reputation.