The legal writing is entitled The Authority of the Regional Representative Council
on the Legislation Process in Tripartite Construction of the Regional
Representative Council, the House of Representatives, and the President. The
formulation of the legal matter is the implication of the Constitutional Court
Decision on the authority of the Regional Representative Council in the legislation
process in tripartite construction and the enhancement of the role of the Regional
Representative Council in the legislation process in tripartite construction. This
study aims to determine whether there are implications for the authority of the
Regional Representative Council after the issuance of the decision of the
Constitutional Court Number 92 / PUU-X / 2012 on the Testing of Law no. 27 of
2009 about MD3 and Law no. 12 Year 2011 about the Establishment of Legislation
and to know how to increase the role of the Regional Representative Council in the
legislation process in tripartite construction. This legal writing can be useful for
high institutions of the state, especially the House of Representatives and Regional
Representative Council in order to get input and the writing of this law is also
useful for people in the regions in order to understand the functions of the
Regional Representative Council . Based on the results of this law writing, it is
suggested that the Regional Representative Council to continue proposing
amendments to the 1945 Constitution, because the judicial review of the
Constitutional Court will always be stuck with the reason of not granting part of
the petitioner's petition due to Article 20 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution so
that Regional Representative Council will not can ever approve a Draft Law related
to Article 22D Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution.