The Supreme Court has the authority to decide on a review request. a review is an

extraordinary remedy that can be done by a convict to the supreme court. by the

bebab it was made the Constitutional Court decision number 34 / PUU-IX / 2013 on

the review. the review process takes a considerable amount of time and is costly, thus

contradicting the simple, quick and light cost of justice. This study uses normative

research method with the aim to find out whether the decision of Constitutional Court

number 34 / PUU-IX / 2013 on the review contradicts the principle of simple, fast

and lightweight. the conclusion of the results of this study is the verdict of the

constitutional court number 34 / PUU-IX / 2013 on the review contrary to the

principle of simple justice, fast and low cost.