Human trafficking is a new form of human slavery. Human trafficking is also the worst
form of violation to human right. The effort to overcome a crime and a policy of crime can be
done in two ways such as “penal” way which concentrates on the “repressive” side of the crime
itself using the law according to the committed crime. The other one, is a “non penal” way which
concentrates on “preventive” side before the crime itself committed. Thus, in general the effort to
overcome a crime can be divided into two ways; penal and non-penal to be more specific about
this, we can use law or without law to overcome a crime. The Judges give a decision to a human
trafficking case at the District Court of Klaten as their jurisdiction base on the facts which
already existed. The intended facts are the facts which already according to everyone” element
and “Using and utilizing the victim of human trafficking I a term of raping and sexual abusing
toward the victim, exploiting the victim in order to get more profit and locking the victim in a
particular place” elements. The accusation which is used in case number 101/PID.B/2010/PN.Klt
is an alternative accusation, which means The Judges, can decide which accusation should be
considered for what the defendant has done according to the existed facts which revealed during
the trial, so they will consider the accusation which has been proved. The purpose of a
punishment in a form of a penalty is not for revenging the defendant, but it is for teaching the
defendant in order to make him/her be wary to commit a crime in the future and also to teach the
society not to commit any crimes like the defendant.