Narcotics rehabilitation program was a series of cooedinated and integrated efforts that
comprised of medical, mental, psychosocial, religious, educational and vocational
traningeffort to improve self adjustment, independence and self-help and also to achieve a
fuctional ability fitted to potentials owned both physically, mentally, social and economically.
Rehabilitation itself was based on Rules No 35 of 2009 that a judge who decided a case
should see article 103 whether rehabilitation verdict was based on Rules No 35 of 2009 on
narcotics was effective in narcotics abuse resolution in Yogyakarta city ? it could be conclude
that as an answer to legal writing case was that narcotics abuse protection by rehabilitation
based on Rules No 35 of 2009 on narcotics through rehabilitation verdict in Yogyakarta city
was not effective due to even through High court of justice had not issue High court of justice
Letter (SEMA) for judge council both in state court and in high court level, however, to
decide narcotics case, the SEMA could not intervene law enforcer apparatus both in
investigator and public prosecutor in the SEMA enforcement could not work well. As a
writer’s suggestion, the police, public prosecutor, attorney and judge were expected to
understand spirit of SEMA No. 4 of 2010 and expected to coordinated among law enforcer so
that rehabilitation decision would be effective